RBAC best practices
Ensure the right people have the right access. Check out our RBAC best practices guide and avoid common pitfalls.
Managing access and permissions in a growing organization can be overwhelming, and role-based access control (RBAC) is here to help. By assigning permissions to roles that match job functions—rather than granting them directly to individuals—RBAC can help simplify access management and ensure everyone gets just the right access.
RBAC sounds simple enough that most developers don’t think twice before jumping in the code. However, to fully harness the power of RBAC and mitigate security risks, it's essential to implement best practices when designing and maintaining an RBAC system.
In this article, we will explore the key principles and best practices that can help organizations optimize their RBAC implementation for security, efficiency, and scalability.
RBAC in a nutshell
RBAC lets you define roles that represent specific job functions (e.g., “Employee,” “Manager,” “Admin”). Each role comes with a set of permissions to perform specific actions—like reading or approving documents. When you assign those roles to users, you effectively control who can do what across your system.
RBAC works in the following way:
- Define the roles: Each role represents a job function or level of authority within the organization. For example, you might have roles like "Admin," "Manager," "Employee," or "Guest."
- Assign permissions to roles: Permissions are specific actions that a user can perform on a system, such as "read," "write," or "delete.” Each role is assigned a set of permissions. Note that you will run your authorization checks against permissions, not roles. For example, if you want to decide whether a user should be able to view a report, you should check if they have the permission reports:read (a permission that might be available to users with the roles of member, manager, or admin).
- Assign roles to users: Roles are assigned to users based on their job responsibilities and security requirements.
For more on RBAC, see The Developer's Guide to RBAC.
Now, let’s see some best practices you should consider in order to build a secure and efficient RBAC system.
Define clear roles and responsibilities
Creating well-defined roles is crucial for effective RBAC management. Ambiguous or overlapping roles can lead to security risks and confusion over what permissions are assigned to whom. Identify the distinct roles in your organization and assign only the permissions necessary for each job function.
What to do:
- Create roles based on job functions: Create roles based on actual job functions or responsibilities, not just titles (e.g., "HR Manager," "Sales Lead," "Software Developer"). Keep roles simple and specific.
- Map permissions: Map permissions to roles, ensuring they match day-to-day tasks.
- Document everything: Document roles and permissions to keep track of changes over time.
Apply the principle of least privilege (PoLP)
The principle of least privilege (PoLP) states that users should only be given the minimum level of access required to perform their job functions. This minimizes the potential damage caused by a compromised account or human error.
What to do:
- Assign roles with minimal permissions: When creating roles, start with the least amount of access and add permissions as needed.
- Regularly review and update permissions: Continuously review and update user roles and permissions to ensure they reflect the user’s current responsibilities.
- Use “read-only” access wherever possible: Use “read-only” access instead of full editing rights wherever possible.
Use role hierarchies
Role hierarchies allow users to inherit permissions from higher-level roles, which keeps things DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) and avoids listing the same permissions in multiple places. This makes it easier to manage permissions for users requiring similar access levels, reducing the administrative burden.
What to do:
- Use hierarchical roles: For example, a "Manager" role might inherit the permissions of the "Employee" role, with additional permissions to manage employee records or approve requests.
- Limit role inheritance to avoid privilege creep: Ensure users only inherit the necessary permissions from higher-level roles. Too many inherited privileges can lead to excessive access rights.
Review and audit roles regularly
Over time, users’ roles and responsibilities may change, and new roles or permissions may be added. As a result, periodic reviews and audits of roles and permissions are essential to ensure appropriate access.
What to do:
- Conduct regular access audits: Set up periodic reviews of roles and permissions to ensure compliance with security policies. Involve stakeholders (team leads, security, compliance) in validating permissions.
- Use automated tools: Use tools that can automatically generate reports on user roles and permissions. Some of these tools are AuditBoard, Netwrix Auditor, and Lepide. If you use an external provider for your authorization needs, ensure their API makes it easy to export a list of roles and permissions.
- Revise access when users change roles: If employees' job responsibilities change, promptly adjust their roles and permissions.
- Keep docs up-to-date: Update documentation to capture any changes in roles and permissions.
Implement RBAC policies
Establish policies that dictate how roles are created, assigned, and modified. Enforcing consistent guidelines helps maintain compliance and prevent unauthorized changes. For example, you could enforce the following policies:
- Role creation: New roles require approval from the security team.
- Role assignment: Only direct supervisors can assign roles.
- Role modification: Any role changes undergo a compliance review.
Avoid over-assigning roles
It can be tempting to assign users multiple roles or grant them more permissions than they need, but this can quickly create security and operational risks.
What to do:
- Minimize the use of multiple roles: Assign the fewest roles necessary to perform a user’s job function, and avoid assigning multiple roles with conflicting permissions.
- Set boundaries for roles: Clearly define what each role can and cannot do. If roles start to overlap, consider refining or consolidating roles.
Apply the principle of separation of duties (SoD)
The principle of separation of duties (SoD) requires that no single individual should have complete control over critical processes. This reduces the risk of fraud, errors, or abuse of power.
What to do:
- Distribute permissions across multiple roles: Ensure that essential tasks (e.g., financial approvals, system configurations) require multiple individuals to complete and prevent any one user from having full access to sensitive operations.
- Cross-check with other controls: Use RBAC in conjunction with other security controls, such as audit logging, monitoring, and approvals, to enforce segregation of duties.
Use incremental authentication
Incremental authentication is a security approach that adjusts the level of authentication required based on the sensitivity of the action or resource the user is attempting to access and sometimes the context of the request (e.g., location, device, time). This can be a useful addition to RBAC to protect against unauthorized access.
Integrating Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) with RBAC can significantly enhance security by adding an additional layer of verification before access is granted.
What to do:
- Require MFA for high-risk roles: Enable MFA for roles with access to sensitive data or critical systems (e.g., administrators, financial officers).
- Use MFA across the board: Implement MFA for all users to ensure attackers cannot easily access your systems even if credentials are compromised.
Scale your RBAC system with care
As your organization grows, so too will your RBAC requirements. A scalable RBAC model allows you to easily add and manage new users, roles, and permissions without overcomplicating the system.
What to do:
- Start with a straightforward, flexible design: Create a role structure that can grow with the organization. Avoid over-complicating roles early on, and ensure the system can scale as needed.
- Automate role assignments: Use identity and access management (IAM) tools to automate role assignments based on job titles, departments, or other attributes, ensuring that users are automatically granted the right roles when they join the organization. Role data mapping via SSO or SCIM is a great and scalable way to keep things in sync. This way, you know that each user’s roles are always up-to-date.
Conclusion
RBAC is a powerful framework for managing access control within an organization, helping to ensure that employees and systems have the appropriate access to resources. By implementing these best practices, organizations can maintain a secure, efficient, and scalable access control system that aligns with security needs and business requirements. Following the principles of least privilege, role definition, and regular reviews can minimize risks while improving overall governance and compliance.
Effective RBAC is not just about assigning roles—it’s about ensuring that the right users have the right level of access at the right time and that the system is continuously maintained and updated to reflect the business's evolving needs.
Ready to get implement RBAC? AuthKit by WorkOS makes adding RBAC to your app easy, with roles and permissions managed directly in the WorkOS dashboard. Best of all, it’s free for up to 1 million MAUs.